The chapter on sex estimation provides a thorough introduction and overview of anthropology sex determination in Joliet methodologies. Sex estimation is based on the premise that male and female skeletal morphology differs in size and shape. Advanced Search.
Find this resource: Garvin, Heather M. Discusses the importance of having a variety of methods available to estimate sex from fragmentary remains.
Alt, Friedrich W. Berg, Gregory E. Langley, Natalie R. Find this resource: Humphrey, Louise. These articles provide a background of established methods for those new to the field as well as validation studies for seasoned readers.
Site Information The tropospheric 14CO2 level in mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere On the use of microstructural bone for age identification. Sagar P.
In evaluation approach 2 14 individuals specimen numbers 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, and 18 , shown in Tables 2 a and 2 b , were identified as belonging to all three of the possible categories male, female, or ambiguous by at least one method in each category.
Method 12 descriptive, mandible shows the highest level of similarity 0. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Society. Complete comparisons of consistency in sex estimates for all metric and morphological methods can be seen in the Appendix. In evaluation approach 4 , Figure 1 a shows that 14 individuals specimen numbers 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 incurred ambiguous results from at least one of the seven metric methods in the determination of their sex.
Accuracy rates were lower than much of the published literature.