The forcible taking of bodily samples and dental impressions is highly invasive of personal privacy Pohoretsky at ; Dyment at ; Colarusso at 53; Stillman at paragraph 42; R. These emotional scars may never heal.
Wong 3 S.
The most intrusive type of search is a body cavity search Golden ; Saeed. My name is Donna McCully. The party seeking to justify a warrantless search bears the onus of rebutting the presumption by establishing that the search was:.
Personal computersbecause of the vast amounts of information they contain — including intimate correspondence, the details of our financial, medical and personal situations, Internet browsing histories, as well as information that users cannot control and information that they may not be aware of or may have chosen to discard — attract a very high expectation of privacy Morelli at paragraph jarvis jones sex offender in Quebec R.
This would include information which tends to reveal intimate details of the lifestyle and personal choices of the individual Plant at Rao12 C. The Supreme Court has suggested that the interests protected by section 8 may extend beyond those of privacy R.
Privacy is a normative rather than descriptive standard Tessling , paragraph 42; R. A person normally does not retain a reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to property or things, including informational content that have been voluntarily abandoned.
It follows that there can only be a relatively low expectation of privacy in respect of premises or documents that are used or produced in the course of activities which, though lawful, are subject to state regulation as a matter of course Thomson Newspapers ; Fitzpatrick ; White ; Branch.